Dirty COW (CVE-2016-5195) is a privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux Kernel
CVE-2016-5195 is the official reference to this bug. CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) is the Standard for Information Security Vulnerability Names maintained by MITRE.
"A race condition was found in the way the Linux kernel's memory subsystem handled the copy-on-write (COW) breakage of private read-only memory mappings. An unprivileged local user could use this flaw to gain write access to otherwise read-only memory mappings and thus increase their privileges on the system." (RH)
In fact, all the boring normal bugs are _way_ more important, just because there's a lot more of them. I don't think some spectacular security hole should be glorified or cared about as being any more "special" than a random spectacular crash due to bad locking.
An exploit using this technique has been found in the wild from an HTTP packet capture according to Phil Oester.
This FAQ provides answers to some of the most frequently asked questions regarding the Dirty COW vulnerability. This is a living document and will be updated regularly at https://dirtycow.ninja.
.
Although the attack can happen in different layers, antivirus signatures that detect Dirty COW could be developed. Due to the attack complexity, differentiating between legitimate use and attack cannot be done easily, but the attack may be detected by comparing the size of the binary against the size of the original binary. This implies that antivirus can be programmed to detect the attack but not to block it unless binaries are blocked altogether.
No.
Even though the actual code fix may appear trivial, the Linux team is the expert in fixing it properly so the fixed version or newer should be used. If this is not possible software developers can recompile Linux with the fix applied.
Please follow instructions.
Exploitation of this bug does not leave any trace of anything abnormal happening to the logs.
Maybe. Maybe not. We don't know. Security community should deploy honeypots that entrap attackers and to alert about exploitation attempts.
It would have been fantastic to eschew this ridiculousness, because we all make fun of branded vulnerabilities too, but this was not the right time to make that stand. So we created a website, an online shop, a twitter account, and used a logo that a professional designer created.
The security community, we included, must learn to find these inevitable human mistakes sooner. Please support the development effort of software you trust your privacy to. Donate money to the FreeBSD project.
For those service providers who are affected, this is a good opportunity to upgrade security strength of the systems used. A lot of software gets updates which otherwise would have not been urgent. Although this is painful for the security community, we can rest assured that infrastructure of the cyber criminals and their secrets have been exposed as well.
